社会杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 211-241.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

实用专业主义:广州市家庭综合服务中心社会工作者“专业能力”的界定及其逻辑

雷杰1, 黄婉怡2   

  1. 1. 中山大学社会学与人类学学院;
    2. 中山大学社会工作教育与研究中心
  • 出版日期:2017-01-20 发布日期:2017-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 黄婉怡,E-mail:1205601737@qq.com E-mail:1205601737@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    本文是教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“社会管理创新背景下的社会工作专业化建构:以广东省为例”（13YJC840017）、国家社科基金项目“整合性干预视角下的困境儿童福利制度研究”（15BSH131）和留学回国人员科研启动基金项目的阶段性成果

Pragmatic Professionalism: Definition of Professional Competence and Its Rationality for Social Workers in Comprehensive Family Service, Guangzhou

LEI Jie1, HUANG Wanyi2   

  1. 1. School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University;
    2. Center for Social Work Education and Research, Sun Yat-sen University
  • Online:2017-01-20 Published:2017-01-20
  • Supported by:

    This research was supported by Youth Funds of Research for Humanities and Social Sciences by the Ministry of Education (13YJC840017),National Social Sciences Fund(15BSH131),the Research Foundation Funds for Returned Overseas Staff and the Fundationtal Research Funds for the Central University

PDF

1004

摘要：

本研究的目的是找出中国社会工作者专业能力体系及其背后的判定逻辑。本研究运用“模糊德尔菲法”的设计，让广东省高校教育界和实务界的专家参考英格兰、美国和中国香港地区的专业能力，选择其中他们认为对广州市家庭综合服务中心社会工作者重要的指标。结果显示，共有价值伦理、理论知识和实务技巧等3个层面，合计24项能力指标被纳入本地的能力体系。经过分析这些专家判定逻辑，本研究还发现该能力体系存在“实用专业主义”的倾向，包括“犬儒思想”“去政治化”和“技术化”等特征。

关键词: 社会工作, 模糊德尔菲法, 专业能力, 家庭综合服务

Abstract:

The professional competence of social workers is a key determinant in the effectiveness of social services. However, so far there are no clearly defined standards of professional competence for social workers in China. This has affected the social recognition of the profession. With the intention of filling in the gap, this study brings together 49 expert educators and practitioners in social work from the comprehensive family service in Guangzhou. The Fuzzy Delphi method is applied to design the study, in which the participants are asked to select important indicators from the professional competence standard index used in UK, the USA and Hong Kong. A total of 29 indicators in three areas are identified by the experts as vital in social work professionalism. These three areas are value and ethnics, theoretical knowledge and practical skills. This newly identified set of indicators can have enormous implication in practice. For the first time, a professional competence standard can be used as guidelines for college social work curriculum development as well as professional education quality evaluation and management. It is also noted that the indicators selected by the participants show a tendency of pragmatism that is compliant, de-political and technocratic, likely an outcome from a mixture of the unique social work education and practice, local politics and other social and cultural conditions in China.

Key words: professional competencies, integrated family services, fuzzy Delphi method, social work