通信工程

改进的对数衰减动态非视距定位

展开
  • 1. 华南理工大学电子与信息学院,广州510641
    2. 广东工业大学信息工程学院,广州510006
王日明,博士生,研究方向:无线传感器网络、统计信号处理,E-mail:wangriming@163.com;冯久超,教授,博导, 研究方向:数字信号处理、数字通信、非线性动力学及混沌理论与应用,E-mail:fengjc@scut.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2013-12-01

  修回日期: 2014-04-03

  网络出版日期: 2014-04-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(No.60872123, No.61101014); 国家自然科学基金委员会(NSFC)-广东省人民政府自然科学联合基金(No.U0835001);广东省高层次人才基金(No.N9101070)资助

Improved Localization in Dynamic Non-line-of-Sight Environments Using a Modified Log Path-Loss Model

Expand
  • 1. School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University
    of Technology, Gongzhou 510641, China
    2. School of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Gongzhou 510006, China

Received date: 2013-12-01

  Revised date: 2014-04-03

  Online published: 2014-04-03

摘要

在一般对数衰减模型中衰减因子是一个常量,但在实际应用中会引起较大的测距定位误差. 为了减少定位估计误差,在对Zigbee 组网定位实验数据进行统计分析的基础上,提出用负指数函数来描述衰减因子与距离(目标节点与锚节点间距)之间的关系,进而建立一种改进对数衰减模型;给出一个基于改进对数衰减模型的ML 估计器,并推导了该估计器的Cramer-Rao下界(Cramer-Row lower bound, CRLB). 在实验室和车站站场的Zigbee 组网定位实验结果表明,使用改进对数衰减模型的ML 估计器能提供更准确的定位估计,对场景变化有较好的适应性.

本文引用格式

王日明1,2, 冯久超1 . 改进的对数衰减动态非视距定位[J]. 应用科学学报, 2014 , 32(4) : 372 -378 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2014.04.006

Abstract

To reduce estimation error caused by static path loss factor in a log path-loss model, a modified log path-loss model is proposed in this paper based on statistical analysis on the Zigbee localization experimental data. In this model, a negative exponent function is used to describe the distance relation of the path loss factor with target nodes and fixed nodes to improve performance of the traditional log path-loss model. A maximum likelihood (ML) estimator and the corresponding Cramer-Rao lower bounds is then proposed and derived. Results of Zigbee localization experiments in laboratory and bus station demonstrate good performance with accurate localization and flexibility for varying environments.

参考文献

[1] ROOS T, MYLLYMAKI P, TIRRI H. A statistical modeling approach to location estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on  Mobile Computing, 2002, 1(1): 59-69.

[2] PATWARI N, HERO III A O, PERKINS M, et al. Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2003, 51(8): 2137-2148.

[3] LI X. RSS-based location estimation with unknown pathloss model [J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2006, 5(12): 3626-3633.

[4] MARTIN R K, KING A S, PENNINGTON J, et al. Modeling and mitigating noise and nuisance parameters in received signal strength positioning [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(10): 5451-5463.

[5] CHAN Y T, HO K C. A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1994, 42(8): 1905-1915.

[6] Hing Cheung So L L. Linear least squares approach for accurate received signal strength based source localization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 2011, 59(8): 4035-4040.

[7] BECK A, STOICA P, LI J. Exact and approximate solutions of source localization problems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, 56(5): 1770-1778.

[8] CHITTE S D, DASGUPTA S. Distance estimation from received signal strength under log-normal shadowing: bias and variance [J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2009, 16(3): 216-218.

[9] OUYANG R W, WONG A, LEA C. Received signal strength-based wireless localization via semidefinite programming: noncooperative and cooperative schemes [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2010, 59(3): 1307-1318.

[10] WANG G. A semidefinite relaxation method for energy-based source localization in sensor networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2011, 60(5): 2293-2301.

[11] MONIR Vaghefi R M, GHOLAMI M R, BUEHRER R M, et al. Cooperative received signal strength-based sensor localization with unknown transmit powers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 2013, 61(6): 1389-1403.

[12] AHN H S, YU W. Environmental-adaptive RSSI-based indoor localization [J]. IEEE Transactions on  Automation Science and Engineering, 2009, 6(4): 626-633.

[13] COLUCCIA A. Reduced-bias ML-based estimators with low complexity for self-calibrating RSS ranging [J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. 2013, 12(3): 1220-1230.

[14] KIM W, LEE J G, JEE G. The interior-point method for an optimal treatment of bias in trilateration location[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2006, 55(4): 1291-1301.

[15] YU K, GUO Y J. Improved positioning algorithms for nonline-of-sight environments [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2008, 57(4): 2342-2353.

[16] VALLET J E, KALTIOKALLIO O, SAARINEN J, et al. On the Sensitivity of rss based localization using the log-normal model: an empirical study [C].// 2013 10th Workshop on Positioning Navigation and Communication (WPNC ), 2013:1-6.

[17] GOLDSMITH A. Wireless communications[M]. [S.l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[18] Kay S M. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing, volume I: Estimation theory [M]. [S.l.]: Person Education, 1993.

[19] YU K, SHARP I, GUO Y J. Ground-based wireless positioning [M]. Wiley. com, 2009.
文章导航

/