信号与信息处理

基于博弈和多智能体的汽车共享服务联盟协同策略研究

展开
  • 武汉理工大学 经济学院, 湖北 武汉 430070

收稿日期: 2019-12-28

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(No.71601151);中国博士后基金特别资助项目(No.2018T110814);中国博士后基金面上资助项目(No.2014M552102);教育部人文社科基金(No.16YJC630131);武汉理工大学研究生优秀学位论文培育项目(No.2017-YS-085)资助

Research on Cooperative Strategy of Automobile Sharing Service Alliance Based on Game Theory and Multi-agent

Expand
  • College of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China

Received date: 2019-12-28

  Online published: 2020-12-08

摘要

基于演化博弈和多智能体仿真,以加强联盟管理、提升联盟服务商合作积极性为目标,研究汽车共享服务联盟协同策略.从演化博弈视角设计综合考虑服务商自身与联盟内其他成员历史信息的学习规则,构建汽车共享服务联盟的多Agent仿真模型,研究收益、成本及惩罚等不同参数设置对服务商协同策略的影响.依据仿真实验结果提出了不同收益、成本和惩罚参数场景下加强联盟合作的策略,为汽车共享服务联盟的协同策略提供决策支持.

本文引用格式

危小超, 范玉瑶 . 基于博弈和多智能体的汽车共享服务联盟协同策略研究[J]. 应用科学学报, 2020 , 38(6) : 995 -1005 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2020.06.016

Abstract

Based on evolutionary game and multi-agent simulation, the cooperative strategy of automobile sharing service alliance studied to strengthen alliance management and enhance the cooperation enthusiasm of alliance service providers. From the perspective of evolutionary game, a multi-agent simulation model of automobile sharing service alliance is designed, which considers the learning rules of history information of the service provider and other members in the alliance. The multi-agent simulation model of automobile sharing service alliance is constructed. In addition, the influence of different parameter settings, such as revenue, cost and penalty on the strategy of service provider alliance is studied. Based on simulation experiment, we propose strategies of strengthening alliance cooperation under different parameters, accordingly providing decision support for the cooperation strategy of automobile sharing service alliance.

参考文献

[1] Giovanni M, Roberta G M, Ludovica P. Shared mobility as a driver for sustainable consumptions:the intention to re-use free-floating car sharing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019(237):1-10.
[2] 张蓓. 汽车共享服务联盟机制研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学经济学院, 2018.
[3] 任鹏, 徐晶晶, 王意, 等. 基于区块链和车联网的汽车租赁联盟的研究与实现[J]. 应用科学学报, 2019, 37(6):851-858. Ren P, Xu J J, Wang Y, et al. Research and implementation of car rental alliance based on blockchain and Internet of vehicles[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2019, 37(6):851-858. (in Chinese)
[4] 赵炎, 姚芳. 创新网络动态演化过程中企业结盟的影响因素研究——基于中国汽车行业创新联盟的分析[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2014(1):76-83. Zhao Y, Yao F. Research on the influencing factors of enterprise alliance in the dynamic evolution of innovation network-based on the analysis of innovation alliance in China's automobile industry[J]. Research and Development Management, 2014(1):76-83. (in Chinese)
[5] Song Z Y, Liu Y Q, Li S X. Research on electric car sharing binding model-a case study of Beijing[C]//Proceedings of Third International Symposium-Management, Innovation and Development, Beijing:2016:559-564.
[6] Meijer L, Schipper F, Huijben J. Align, adapt or amplify:upscaling strategies for car sharing business models in Sydney, Australia[J]. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2019(33):215-230.
[7] Guido P, Francesco F, Stefano M, et al. Business models and tariff simulation in carsharing services[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2018(115):32-48.
[8] Robyn D, Jennifer K. Practice and public-private partnerships in sustainable transport governance:The case of car sharing in Sydney, Australia[J]. Transport Policy, 2015(40):58-64.
[9] 经有国, 郭培强, 秦开大. 需求率受推广努力水平影响的新能源汽车租赁系统协调契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3):94-100. Jing Y G, Guo P Q, Qin K D. New energy car rental system coordination contract with demand rate affected by promotion efforts[J]. China Management Science, 2018, 26(3):94-100. (in Chinese)
[10] 张华. 协同创新、知识溢出的演化博弈机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(2):92-99. Zhang H. Research on evolutionary game mechanism of collaborative innovation and knowledge spillover[J]. China Management Science, 2016, 24(2):92-99. (in Chinese)
[11] 危小超, 李岩峰, 聂规划, 等. 基于后悔理论与多Agent模拟的新产品扩散消费者决策互动行为研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11):66-75. Wei X C, Li Y F, Nie G H, et al. Research on the interaction behavior of new product diffusion consumer decision-making based on Regret Theory and multi-agent simulation[J]. China Management Science, 2017, 25(11):66-75. (in Chinese)
[12] 柳键, 江玮璠. 基于零售商过度自信的供应链存货质押决策分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2018(9):118-128. Liu J, Jiang W F. Analysis of supply chain inventory pledge decision based on retailer overconfidence[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, 2018(9):118-128. (in Chinese)
[13] 蒋国银, 胡斌. 集成博弈和多智能体的人群工作互动行为研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011(2):33-45. Jiang G Y, Hu B. Research on the interaction behavior of group work based on integrated game and multi-agent[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2011(2):33-45. (in Chinese)
[14] 蒋国银, 胡斌, 王缓缓. 基于Agent和进化博弈的服务商动态联盟协同管理策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(2):86-92. Jiang G Y, Hu B, Wang H H. Cooperative management strategy of dynamic alliance of service providers based on agent and evolutionary game[J]. China Management Science, 2009, 17(2):86-92. (in Chinese)
[15] 肖海燕. 基于演化博弈的公共交通、共享汽车与私家车的博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(8):35-40. Xiao H Y. Game analysis of public transport, shared car and private car based on evolutionary game[J]. Operation Research and Management, 2019, 28(8):35-40. (in Chinese)
[16] Serrano E, Iglesias C A. Validating viral marketing strategies in Twitter via agent-based social simulation[M]. Oxford:Pergamon Press, Inc. 2016.
[17] Neville B, Fasli M, Pitt J. Utilising social recommendation for decision-making in distributed multi-agent systems[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(6):2884-2906.
文章导航

/