CCF NCCA 2020专栏

追踪物理学中的跨领域模因

展开
  • 1. 兰州交通大学 电子与信息工程学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2. 甘肃同兴智能科技发展有限责任公司, 甘肃 兰州 730050;
    3. 国网甘肃省电力公司 信息通信公司, 甘肃 兰州 730050

收稿日期: 2020-08-26

  网络出版日期: 2021-06-08

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(No.62062049);教育部人文社会科学研究基金(No.20YJCZH212);甘肃省自然科学基金(No.20JR5RA390)资助

Tracking Interdisciplinary Memes in Physics

Expand
  • 1. School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;
    2. Gansu Tongxing Intelligent Technology Development Company, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China;
    3. Information and Telecommunication Company, State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China

Received date: 2020-08-26

  Online published: 2021-06-08

摘要

以美国物理学会旗下期刊2000—2019年发表的论文和Web of Science论文摘要为基础,用模因短语刻画知识,构建模因关系网络并引入跨学科测度Rao-Stirling指数以计算模因的跨领域分数,从而追踪物理学中的跨领域模因。分别从网络拓扑结构指标、跨领域测度指标和专业术语对比3个方面进行验证,证明了所提的模因关系网络和模因的跨领域分数可以有效反映知识在不同领域间的扩散现象。

本文引用格式

周毅, 闫光辉, 卢彬炜, 王珊, 李世魁, 卫祥, 杨仕博, 靳丹 . 追踪物理学中的跨领域模因[J]. 应用科学学报, 2021 , 39(3) : 387 -386 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2021.03.005

Abstract

Based on the papers published in American Physical Society (APS) journals from 2000 to 2019 and abstracts from Web of Science, we firstly use meme phrases to describe knowledge and construct meme correlation network (MCN) to track interdisciplinary memes. And then we use Rao-Stirling index to calculate the interdisciplinary scores of memes, and track interdisciplinary memes in physics. The verification experiment was carried out from three perspectives of network topology index, interdisciplinary measurement index and professional terminology comparison. It proved that the meme correlation network (MCN) and the interdisciplinary score of memes in this paper can effectively reflect the diffusion of knowledge in different domains.

参考文献

[1] Clauset A, Larremore D B, Sinatra R. Data-driven predictions in the science of science[J]. Science, 2017, 355(6324): 477-480.
[2] Fortunato S, Bergstrom C T, Borner K, et al. Science of science[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6379): 1007.
[3] Redner S. How popular is your paper? an empirical study of the citation distribution[J]. The European Physical Journal B, 1998, 4(2): 131-134.
[4] Price D J D S. Little science, big science[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
[5] Newman M E J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(Suppl.1): 5200-5205.
[6] Newman M E J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(2): 404-409
[7] Milojevi S. Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111(11): 3984-3989.
[8] Bromham L, Dinnage R, Hua X. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7609): 684-687.
[9] Dias L, Gerlach M, Scharloth J, et al. Using text analysis to quantify the similarity and evolution of scientific disciplines[J]. Royal Society Open Science, 2018, 5(1): 171545.
[10] Jacob G, Foster A R J A. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies[J]. American Sociological Review, 2015, 80(5): 875-908.
[11] Larivière V, Haustein S, Börner K. Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(3): e122565.
[12] Boyack K W, Klavans R, Börner K. Mapping the backbone of science[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 64(3): 351-374.
[13] Falk-Krzesinski H J, Contractor N, Fiore S M, et al. Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(2): 143-156.
[14] Kuhn T, Perc M, Helbing D. Inheritance patterns in citation networks reveal scientific memes[J]. Physical Review X, 2014, 4(4): 41036.
[15] Dawkins R. The selfish gene[M]. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1976.
[16] Gomez-Rodriguez M, Leskovec J, Krause A. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence[J]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2012, 5(4): 1-37.
[17] 关智远, 陈仕吉. 跨学科知识交流研究综述[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(3): 153-158. Guan Z Y Chen S J. Review on interdisciplinary knowledge communication[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2016, 35(3): 153-158. (in Chinese)
[18] Hou H, Kretschmer H, Liu Z. The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2): 189-202.
[19] Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
[20] Muldoon S F, Bridgeford E W, Bassett D S. Small-world propensity and weighted brain networks[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 22057.
[21] Price D J. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515.
[22] Dworkin J D, Shinohara R T, Bassett D S. The emergent integrated network structure of scientific research[J]. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14(4): e216146.
[23] Blondel V D, Guillaume J, Lambiotte R, et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10): P10008.
[24] Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine[J]. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1998, 30(1): 107-117.
[25] 陈仕吉, 康温和, 江文森. 跨学科研究在科学研究中越来越重要?[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(7): 1153-1160. Chen S J, Kang W H, Jiang W S. Is interdisciplinary research becoming more important in science?[J]. Studies in Science of Science. 2018, 36(7): 1153-1160. (in Chinese)
文章导航

/