基于三方加权稀疏编码模型的PRNU提取算法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2019.05.011

应用科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 704-710.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2019.05.011

基于三方加权稀疏编码模型的PRNU提取算法

张永胜^1,2, 田华伟^1,2, 肖延辉^1,2, 郝昕泽^1,2, 张明旺³

1. 中国人民公安大学国家安全与反恐怖学院, 北京 100038;
2. 中国人民公安大学公安情报研究中心, 北京 100038;
3. 四川警察学院科研所, 四川泸州 646000

收稿日期:2019-07-27 修回日期:2019-08-01 出版日期:2019-09-30 发布日期:2019-10-18
通信作者: 田华伟,副教授,研究方向:信息隐藏与多媒体取证,E-mail:hwtian@live.cn E-mail:hwtian@live.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No.61772539，No.6187212，No.61972405）；四川省科技计划项目（No.2018JY0521）；公安部技术研究计划（No.2017JSYJC01）；四川省泸州市科技局项目（No.2018-GYF-8）资助

PRNU Extraction Algorithm Based on Trilateral Weighted Sparse Coding Model

ZHANG Yongsheng^1,2, TIAN Huawei^1,2, XIAO Yanhui^1,2, HAO Xinze^1,2, ZHANG Mingwang³

1. School of National Security and Counter Terrorism, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China;
2. Research Center for Public Security Information, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China;
3. Institute of Research, Sichuan Police College, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China

Received:2019-07-27 Revised:2019-08-01 Online:2019-09-30 Published:2019-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 估计图像中真实噪声是基于光照响应不一致（photo-response non-uniformity， PRNU）对图像来源取证的关键步骤.相较于加性高斯白噪声（additive white Gaussian noise， AWGN）的估计，现有多数PRNU提取算法所采用的噪声估计算法在图像真实噪声提取方面性能劣势明显.该文提出了一种基于三方加权稀疏编码模型（trilateral weighted sparse codingmodel，TWSCM）的PRNU提取算法.TWSCM在估计噪声时能够保留更多PRNU噪声成分，有助于对图像中PRNU噪声的提取，因此在真实噪声估计上具有较好的性能.在当前最大的图像相机源取证基准库上的测试，实验结果证明所提出的基于TWSC的PRNU提取算法在图像相机源取证任务中具有较好的性能.

关键词: 图像来源取证, 光照响应不一致, 真实图像噪声估计

Abstract: Estimating the real noise of real-world image is the most important issue of image source forensics based on photo-response non-uniformity (PRNU). Compared with the estimation of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), most exsiting noise estimation algorithms used in PRNU extraction behave with poor satisfaction in estimating real noise. In this paper, we propose a PRNU extraction algorithm based on trilateral weighted sparse coding model (TWSCM). TWSCM has advantage in estimating the real noise of real-world image, because it can keep more PRNU noise in the estimation results. Having been tested on the largest image source forensics database, the proposed TWSCM-based PRNU extraction algorithm outperforms the existing algorithm of source forensic.

Key words: image source forensic, photo-response non-uniformity (PRNU), real-word image denoising

中图分类号:

TP391

张永胜, 田华伟, 肖延辉, 郝昕泽, 张明旺. 基于三方加权稀疏编码模型的PRNU提取算法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2019, 37(5): 704-710.

ZHANG Yongsheng, TIAN Huawei, XIAO Yanhui, HAO Xinze, ZHANG Mingwang. PRNU Extraction Algorithm Based on Trilateral Weighted Sparse Coding Model[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2019, 37(5): 704-710.

参考文献

[1] Kurosawa K, Kuroki K, Saitoh N. CCD fingerprint method-identification of a video camera from videotaped images[C]//Image Processing. IEEE, 1999:537-540.
[2] Geradts Z J, Bijhold J, Kieft M, et al. Methods for identification of images acquired with digital cameras[J]. Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement, 2001, 4232:505-512.
[3] Bayram S, Sencar H, Memon N, et al. Source camera identification based on CFA interpolation[C]//Image Processing. IEEE, 2005:69.
[4] Swaminathan A, Wu M, Liu K J R. Nonintrusive component forensics of visual sensors using output images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2007, 2(1):91-106.
[5] Sorrell M J. Digital camera source identification through JPEG quantisation[M]. USA:IGI Global, 2009:291-313.
[6] Alles E J, Geradts Z J, Veenman C J. Source camera identification for heavily JPEG compressed low resolution still images[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2009, 54(3):628-638.
[7] Choi K S, Lam E Y, Wong K K. Source camera identification using footprints from lens aberration[C]//The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2006, 6069:172-179.
[8] Van L T, Emmanuel S, Kankanhalli M. Identifying source cell phone using chromatic aberration[C]//Multimedia and Expo. IEEE, 2007:9804424.
[9] 杨锐,骆伟祺,黄继武. 多媒体取证[J]. 中国科学-信息科学,2013, 43(12):1654-1672. Yang R, Luo W Q, Huang J W. Multimedia forensics[J]. China Science-Information Science, 2013, 43(12):1654-1672. (in Chinese)
[10] Al-Ani M, Khelifi F. On the SPN estimation in image forensics:a systematic empirical evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2017, 12(5):1067-1081.
[11] Lukas J, Fridrich J, Goljan M. Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2006, 1(2):205-214.
[12] Kang X, Chen J, Lin K, et al. A context-adaptive SPN predictor for trustworthy source camera identification[J]. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2014(1):19.1-19.11.
[13] Cooper, Alan J. Improved photo response non-uniformity (PRNU) based source camera identification[J]. Forensic Science International, 2013, 226(1/3):132-141.
[14] Zeng H, Kang X. Fast source camera identification using content adaptive guided image filter[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2016, 61(2):520-526.
[15] Cortiana A, Conotter V, Boato G, et al. Performance comparison of denoising filters for source camera identification[C]//Media Watermarking, Security and Forensics Ⅲ. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2011, 7880(1):788007-788007-6.
[16] Nam S, Hwang Y, Matsushita Y, et al. A holistic approach to cross-channel image noise modeling and its application to image denoising[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2016:1683-1691.
[17] Xu J, Zhang L, Zhang D, et al. Multi-channel weighted nuclear norm minimization for real color image denoising[C]//IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2017:1096-1104.
[18] Xu J, Zhang L, Zhang D. A trilateral weighted sparse coding scheme for real-world image denoising[J]. The European Conference on Computer Vision, 2018, 11212:20-36.
[19] Guo S, Yan Z, Zhang K, et al. Toward convolutional blind denoising of real photographs[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, 1712-1722.
[20] Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1996, 58(1):267-288.
[21] Gloe T, Böhme R. The Dresden image database for benchmarking digital image forensics[J]. Journal of Digital Forensic Practice, 2010, 3(2/4):150-159.
[22] Goljan M, Fridrich J, Tomáă F. Large scale test of sensor fingerprint camera identification[C]//Media Forensics and Security, 2009:72540I. 01-72540I.12.
[23] Galdi C, Hartung F, Dugelay J. SOCRatES:a database of realistic data for source camera recognition on smartphones[C]//International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods, 2019:19-21.
[24] Shullani D, Fontani M, Iuliani M, et al. VISION:a video and image dataset for source identification[J]. EURASIP Journal on Information Security, 2017(1):15.1-15.16.
[25] Tian H, Xiao Y, Cao G, et al, Daxing smartphone identification dataset[J]. IEEE Access, 2009, 7:101046-101053.

基于三方加权稀疏编码模型的PRNU提取算法

PRNU Extraction Algorithm Based on Trilateral Weighted Sparse Coding Model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李永桢, 马涪元, 马世旋, 王钰涵, 王英. 基于结构增强和深度聚类的网络群体识别[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 1-20.
[2]	李银香, 杜文元, 许哲, 彭晨, 颜建强. 基于自适应池增强注意力机制的交通模式实时识别算法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 21-33.
[3]	张钰婷, 滕飞, 叶晓庆. 基于高斯度量学习的不确定性知识图谱推理模型[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 50-66.
[4]	向尕, 胡演, 张仰森, 孙露, 齐睿, 谭自程. 面向威胁情报分析的恶意软件知识图谱构建[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 67-82.
[5]	伊华伟, 宋仕玺, 王艳飞, 白思怡. 融合图神经网络和深度图聚类的联邦推荐算法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 83-96.
[6]	吴文强, 陈爱斌, 李潇瑶. 基于特征融合注意力和对比学习的森林图像去雾[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 97-109.
[7]	张晓明, 冯泽嘉, 王会勇, 张晓静. 基于动态注意力强化学习的可解释学习路径推荐[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 110-133.
[8]	金正洋, 阎少宏, 张艳博, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 陈志远. 融合空间纹理特征的三维模糊聚类算法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 134-148.
[9]	徐凯, 池明得, 王崎, 李建州, 张辉. 融合BERT编码层的多粒度语义方面级情感分析模型[J]. 应用科学学报, 2026, 44(1): 149-165.
[10]	刘永畅, 杜怡颖, 吴翠莹, 刘亚文. 航空影像引导的LiDAR点云语义分割[J]. 应用科学学报, 2025, 43(6): 922-934.
[11]	王金伟, 黄琬云, 张家伟, 罗向阳, 马宾. 基于可恢复对抗水印的主动防御方法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2025, 43(6): 935-947.
[12]	郭彦纯, 熊邦书, 黎文超, 温书远. 基于零参考网络的直升机桨叶低光图像增强[J]. 应用科学学报, 2025, 43(6): 990-1002.
[13]	闫振国, 陈杨, 刘如飞, 王金博, 张佳琦. 基于空间临近的森林样地树木点云分割方法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2025, 43(6): 1003-1014.
[14]	高剑奇, 黄典, 骆祥峰. 基于句法语义增强的实体事件关系对联合抽取[J]. 应用科学学报, 2025, 43(6): 1024-1036.
[15]	韩佳洁, 苑清扬, 张博, 赵鑫, 兰天, 李郁. 基于少测点噪声数据重构问题的改进Gappy POD算法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2025, 43(5): 740-756.