[1] Clauset A, Larremore D B, Sinatra R. Data-driven predictions in the science of science[J]. Science, 2017, 355(6324): 477-480. [2] Fortunato S, Bergstrom C T, Borner K, et al. Science of science[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6379): 1007. [3] Redner S. How popular is your paper? an empirical study of the citation distribution[J]. The European Physical Journal B, 1998, 4(2): 131-134. [4] Price D J D S. Little science, big science[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963. [5] Newman M E J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(Suppl.1): 5200-5205. [6] Newman M E J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(2): 404-409 [7] Milojevi S. Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111(11): 3984-3989. [8] Bromham L, Dinnage R, Hua X. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7609): 684-687. [9] Dias L, Gerlach M, Scharloth J, et al. Using text analysis to quantify the similarity and evolution of scientific disciplines[J]. Royal Society Open Science, 2018, 5(1): 171545. [10] Jacob G, Foster A R J A. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies[J]. American Sociological Review, 2015, 80(5): 875-908. [11] Larivière V, Haustein S, Börner K. Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(3): e122565. [12] Boyack K W, Klavans R, Börner K. Mapping the backbone of science[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 64(3): 351-374. [13] Falk-Krzesinski H J, Contractor N, Fiore S M, et al. Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(2): 143-156. [14] Kuhn T, Perc M, Helbing D. Inheritance patterns in citation networks reveal scientific memes[J]. Physical Review X, 2014, 4(4): 41036. [15] Dawkins R. The selfish gene[M]. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1976. [16] Gomez-Rodriguez M, Leskovec J, Krause A. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence[J]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2012, 5(4): 1-37. [17] 关智远, 陈仕吉. 跨学科知识交流研究综述[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(3): 153-158. Guan Z Y Chen S J. Review on interdisciplinary knowledge communication[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2016, 35(3): 153-158. (in Chinese) [18] Hou H, Kretschmer H, Liu Z. The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2): 189-202. [19] Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719. [20] Muldoon S F, Bridgeford E W, Bassett D S. Small-world propensity and weighted brain networks[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 22057. [21] Price D J. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515. [22] Dworkin J D, Shinohara R T, Bassett D S. The emergent integrated network structure of scientific research[J]. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14(4): e216146. [23] Blondel V D, Guillaume J, Lambiotte R, et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10): P10008. [24] Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine[J]. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1998, 30(1): 107-117. [25] 陈仕吉, 康温和, 江文森. 跨学科研究在科学研究中越来越重要?[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(7): 1153-1160. Chen S J, Kang W H, Jiang W S. Is interdisciplinary research becoming more important in science?[J]. Studies in Science of Science. 2018, 36(7): 1153-1160. (in Chinese) |