Journal of Applied Sciences ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 590-608.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2019.05.002

• Special Issue: Information Security of Multimedia • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation and Comparison of Five Popular Fake Face Detection Networks

GAO Yifei1, HU Yongjian1,2, YU Zeqiong1, LIN Yuyi1, LIU Beibei1,2   

  1. 1. School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;
    2. Sino-Singapore International Joint Research Institute, Guangzhou 511356, China
  • Received:2019-07-27 Revised:2019-07-31 Online:2019-09-30 Published:2019-10-18

Abstract: Several fake face detectors based on convolutional neural network (CNN) have been reported to resist the impact of fake faces, but they all face a common problem that the intra-dataset test is generally with high accuracy, but the performance of crossdataset test drops significantly, which indicates low generalization ability. Based on thorough evaluations for five popular fake face detectors including MesoInception-4, MISLnet, ShallowNetV1, Inception-v3 and Xception, this paper completes both intra-dataset test and cross-dataset test on three fake face datasets. In experiment, the effects on generalization ability from of factors, such as dataset partition, data augmentation and threshold selection, are investigated.

Key words: fake face video detection, deep neural network, generalization, dataset partition, data augmentation, threshold selection

CLC Number: